This idea has not been published by the writer yet.

Many Consumer, Employment, and Civil Rights Groups Oppose Forced Arbitration

Accept:
Entire view
This view has not yet been published by the writer. You cannot agree with an unpublished view.
Accept:
Point only
Transfer
6 Reasons
People don't know they've agreed to it.
Expand|Info|Accept
Zinus furniture's arbitration agreement is clear and obvious for consumers
Fortunately, some companies, like the image shown above, help make it clear to consumers that arbitration is the agreed dispute resolution after buying the product. However, many more companies never make it obvious or clear to the general buying public.
Forced arbitration clauses bind the consumer, but not the company.
Info|Accept
Employees can't sue for discrimination, harassment, abuse, retaliation, or wrongful termination.
Info|Accept
Consumers can't sue for negligence, defective products, or scams.
Info|Accept
Arbitration proceedings are private, and there is no judge, jury, or right to an appeal.
Info|Accept
Arbitration severely limits consumer options for resolving different types of meaningful disputes.
Info|Accept
Owner
Sources
National Association of Consumer Advocates, Arbitration
By continuing with Google or Facebook, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and acknowledge our Privacy Policy.
Login here
What is Goodpoint for? Learn how the platform makes a bigger impact.