This idea has not been published by the writer yet.

Problematic Forced Arbitration Clauses Are Included In Many Company's Employment Terms & Conditions

These clauses often favor the employer over the employee. And many employees, especially those who are underemployed, are quick to sign regardless of this unjust clause.
This view has not yet been published by the writer. You cannot agree with an unpublished view.
Accept:
Point
Transfer
Problematic Forced Arbitration Clauses Are Included In Many Company's Employment Terms & Conditions
Forced arbitration means that when an employee has a dispute against a company, they are not able to take it to court to present their case in front of a jury of their peers. Instead, the proceedings are kept private, and a single arbitrator decides the outcome of the case. While there are similar rules of law, there are critical differences and incentives at play. For example, arbitration is often paid for by the company, who also pays the arbitration organization, which means there's less neutrality. For example, in a court of law, the judges are paid by the state or country's tax dollars, which comes from its citizens. Forced arbitration is also a problem because newly hired employees are forced to sign these legal agreements if they want to get a job with the company. This is is often a prerequisite for a job. Finding a job is already hard enough, especially in the employment precarity during the COVID-19 pandemic. And because almost all companies include these forced arbitration provisions in their contracts, employees can't easily find another employer that does not include these clauses.
Owner
Sean agrees with this fact based on
Observation
I've seen them and read about them.
By continuing with Google or Facebook, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and acknowledge our Privacy Policy.
Login here
What is Goodpoint for? Learn how the platform makes a bigger impact.